The Daily (as well as its NYT mothership) has been responsible for some of the most grave journalistic crimes in its non/anti-reportage of factual events happening in the occupied Palestinian territories. For 18 months they have ignored or distorted the truth of the unfolding genocide.

I listen to this show and True Anon. They are both equally excellent and very similar

Both the print article and this podcast omitted the fact that Lio XIV ended his first appearance with the traditional prayer, the Hail Mary, To Catholic ears, most traditional and to progressives, the doctrinal reason for including women. Aldo, you mention politics but not prayer. These people actually believe in the guidance of the Holy Spirit found in prayer

Michael Barbaro gets it wrong a lot. Smug. lack of self awareness.

How do Trump admin firings of FAA air traffic controllers affect this.

Only review I’ve ever made on a podcast but I’ve hit a moment where I feel compelled to share feedback. I’m stuck between my desire to continue to invest in all the amazing stories that NYT curates here and my increasing frustration with Barbaro’s interview tactics. There’s often a noticeable bias and effort to dig for controversy - even with guests who’ve made significant positive contributions. While critical questions are important, the persistent focus on flaws - like when he’s pressing Sorkin about the dirt on Warren Buffett in the interview - can feel more provocative than informative. It could be compared to that person you know who always leads the conversation towards negative gossip. It’s just in the way of good media. It clouds the message and reduces the listener’s ability to appreciate the full story. A more balanced approach would go a long way.

Do you all have to speak with successive pregnant pauses like you’re reporting the most important facts of the century and you want a Pulitzer, or whatever it is for podcasts?

Love the pod and the Times. Emily Steel needs to work on her big girl voice. Babaro takes lots of weird robotic pauses. Just sayin

Updated Review: What happened? Every story is about Donald Trump. The coverage on Palestine was abysmal and so openly biased. A world of news and is still happening—where are the diverse people and deeper perspectives? This show is full of deeply talented and dedicated people whose editorial fire seems to have been dampened or perhaps reigned in, like so many journalists. Considering the state of media, I guess this is unsurprising. But I really miss the old show. The old show had so much heart. Old Review: I’ve listened to this podcast since it debuted and it’s been amazing to see it grow and evolve. Instead of covering a million topics in 20 mins, the host takes on one trending news topic and delves deep into the specifics. It’s a refreshing antidote to most crammed news formats. Keep it up!

Listen to a variety of podcasts for a week. During this little experiment, note which podcasts inform you with in-depth stories of people across the political spectrum and multiple experts. Are other podcasts careful to include conservative, middle and lib experts? You will likely come back around to the Times and realize no podcast is perfect or perfectly unbiased. But Michael Barbaro is a pro and the fact-checking and reporting is very strong.

Appreciate a daily story. Of course folks are going to leach bias in reviews - for those, maybe go elsewhere?

Ms. Brodesser Akner as a wonderful writer. And the reading of this article was perfect. Thank you.

There is an appalling lack of fact checking, and reporting the truth in the news media. However, Michael Barbaro and Sabrina Tavernise (until sadly, she left ) are highly qualified, professional journalists with talent, integrity, and a commitment to use reliable sources. Are they entirely objective? No. No one is. And I don’t agree with every story angle. But given the other choices in digital news, this podcast has consistently risen to the top.

Anyone supporting Trump right now need to move to Russia and then they will realize how damaging he is to our country! Thank you NYT, hold strong against the autocracy about to happen!!

I used to enjoy listening to The Daily when I first discovered the podcast. It was informative and well-produced. But now, almost all of their episodes are locked behind a subscription. Really disappointing. Just another media company putting profits over access to information. Lame.

Been a listener since late 2017 when the episodes had the date as episode titles. They really do their part to immerse the listener to the heart of the subject matter

Today’s podcast - Wow! What a heartbreaking and eye opening story on Trump’s chaotic and cruel deportation push. Jessica Cheung is an incredible interviewer/journalist and her interview of Ayla, the daughter of a deported man is everything news reporting should be. Thank you NYTimes.

So Boring. This episode is not even informative. This is a 20 year old girl talking 70% of the time while I learn nothing about what the administration is doing. 20 minutes in and still waiting for the anecdote to end. Back to hard Journalism please. This is the only episode of the daily I felt was a waste of time

When The Daily first came out, it was easily in my top 10 podcasts - for the most part, interesting and relevant topics and guests and quality interviewing However, it has now often deteriorated into an echo chamber in which the host Rachel (please decrease her presence by at least 70%) merely tries to re-state what the guest has said (amongst an ungodly chorus of her own "mmmms" and "hmmmm" sounds) She does not provide useful context or engage with the guest in any meaningful way NYT, nice that you try to have female hosts, but for Pete's sake do a better job of vetting their qualifications to sit in the host chair!! How about rotating hosts every 2 weeks until you find 3-4 who can do a better job, then keep them all on rotation?? Also, the Rufo "interview " was vile. If you want to interview people in MAGA works then FACT CHECK them in real time!!!

Unfollowing because the content is no longer informational. It’s filled with opinion and intended to persuade in one particular direction.

Listening to the Trump crypto episode. I think what they are describing is wrong, but Rachel just paraphrased the reporter as saying, “legal grey area” right after the reporter just said it was legal by the fine print. This is just one example of many of hers. I wish I heard more from her presenting and challenging the contrary point of view.

The real estate episode was so poorly researched. Commission has always been negotiable. Have you not looked at flat rate listing services or MLS upload only options? People have always had a choice to decide how much to pay. There’s also so much more that could and should’ve been said. One thing that’s true is NAR is managed horribly and almost mandatory for no reason

I look forward to the in depth story coverage. I can’t count the number of times this podcast has given me timely perspectives of current issues.

S/O to this gentleman for openly stating what’s happening in this country instead of rationalizing the cuckoo bananas running this joint.

The student loan information that there is not a cap is absolutely untrue. You max out at a certain amount for an undergrad degree and for a grad degree. My other complaint is Jonathan Swan. He’s super smart but his voice is extremely irritating to listen to. I have to forward through when he’s talking.

Shocking one sided erroneous reporting. Google boulder discount broker and there are a ton that list their commission as low as 1%. This whole story was a lie highlighting one POV from a man trying to do a startup! This was a sham. MORTIFYING

In the April 29, 2025 episode of The Daily titled “The Housing Market Has New Rules. Realtors Are Evading Them,” the podcast discusses how some real estate agents are allegedly circumventing new regulations intended to reduce transaction costs for consumers. While the episode highlights concerns about certain practices, it risks overgeneralizing the behavior of all real estate professionals, which can be misleading.  Overgeneralization of Real Estate Agents The episode suggests that real estate agents, as a collective group, are evading new rules designed to lower home buying and selling costs. However, this portrayal doesn’t account for the vast majority of agents who adhere to ethical standards and embrace transparency. Many professionals in the industry are committed to providing value to their clients and are adapting to new regulations in good faith.  Reliance on Anecdotal Evidence The podcast relies heavily on individual cases and anecdotal evidence to support its claims. While these stories are important, they don’t necessarily represent the broader industry. Without comprehensive data, it’s challenging to determine how widespread the alleged practices are among real estate agents. Lack of Context on Industry Reforms The episode doesn’t fully explore the efforts many agents and brokerages are making to comply with new regulations and improve industry practices. By focusing predominantly on negative examples, the podcast overlooks the positive changes and adaptations occurring within the real estate sector. Conclusion While it’s crucial to address and rectify unethical practices in real estate, it’s equally important to avoid painting the entire profession with a broad brush. Many agents are dedicated to serving their clients with integrity and are actively working to adapt to new industry standards. A balanced perspective that acknowledges both the challenges and the positive strides within the industry would provide a more accurate and fair representation.

Latest episode on realtors is so one-sided and demeaning to realtors. Paints the whole industry as crooks looking for a fast buck.

If you are looking to better understand how the media is gaslighting the public opinion, look no further. Everything is taken totally out of context. TDS in full effect. Give us some other news!

I stuck with the show for as long as I could, but the melodramatic intonations and exaggerated cadences of the host were just too much to bear. If I hear another “hmmm” or “ahhhh” during an interview, I’ll lose it. The opening of every show is done like Stan Lee might do it, only this guy doesn’t possess that kind of voice. It’s so cringe.

Super inaccurate reporting about the Real Estate industry and the commission "work-around". We don't always split commissions 50/50, the seller doesn't pay the commission (the buyer does in the price of the house) and nobody is setting cookies out to convey commissions in code. The fact is that an attorney decided he wanted to make money and started a class action to do that. And he made out big. Real estate is overpriced because of the lack of inventory. Our commissions have always been negotiable. And if buyers had to pay their buyer's commission, plus their down payment, plus their closing costs all out of pocket, nobody but the wealthy could afford to buy a house. And the new rules require that we have to get an agreement signed stating what we I'll get paid and it is (as it's always been ) negotiable. The lawsuit only made it easier for us to get paid. Because let's face it... we also need to feed our families just like the buyers, sellers and everyone in between.

It’s ALL TRUMP. Talk about something else just once, It’s getting old

I just wonder who these people that think Trump is not popular are lieing to. Do they really believe this? Keep lieing to yourselves ... Trump 2028

I really appreciate all your hard work during a time when journalism is suppressed by the current admin. I just joined the NYT because I want to support free press. Keep going!!!

They’ve taken it much further Not much farther Come on NYTimes

I asked a good “Left” friend of mine what podcast I should listen to for news, and she suggested this one. It has given me much insight and perspective on what others who think differently than I do. One thought I keep having while listening is that these reporters seem to be giving democrats ideas on how to be activists. Another thought, since I also listen to Morning Wire, is that these reporters seem to knowingly or ignorantly withhold important details of stories. I just wish I could hear the news without having to go to both extremes. (I’ve been dissatisfied with those news agencies who purport to be moderate or neutral.)

When I wanna be lied to and get the real good corporate act, dark money, America, last viewpoint, I pull up my good old New York Times and let the stooges go off.

First off, the situation with trump and the so called *enemies* is like making a bunch of random and untrue information. Who would want to believe a single word you say in that episode? Also, they don’t give a bunch of specific evidence rather than just spam and say whatever type of junk they want. I seriously don’t know what to say anymore. I trusted the news ever since the war in Israel but this time, they’ve gone too far. They give nothing but misleading information and garbage and they cannot be trusted anymore. I recommend you a different news podcast like Trevor Noah, but this? It’s a bunch of garbage. I think all of our reviews can definitely prove that. 👎

Adam reading excerpts from a kids story book made my day! Awesome.

Totally living in a bubble. I like episodes where they talk to "normal voters" and even discussing their responses still don't get it.

To Rachel Abrams: You cannot possibly both sides now what was done to these prisoners."Some people think this is acceptable collateral damage". Come on. It flies in the face of the constitution and everything it means to be an American. The Daily needs to have more courage!! These are strong arm tactics of an authoritarian. The New York Times needs to stop taking the path of least resistance. You empower these illegal and horrific acts when you do.

It’s all Trump, it’s boring, it’s getting old. Bring back other news :)

I’ve always been a huge fan of this podcast because of the way they explain both sides of issues in very clear and factual ways. It gives me and my husband, the ability to listen together and discuss current politics rationally and with facts not conjecture. In a world full of distorted viewpoints, I appreciate the thorough explanations on both sides of the story and the why behind what’s happening. If we don’t have real reporting like this, we cannot make informed decisions and have meaningful conversations even when we disagree.

There are caps on Federal Student Loans. I’m not sure why you’re interviewee kept stating there’s no dollar cap. There are dollar caps, you max out regardless of whether you finish your degree. Lots of students have not completed a degree and are saddled with Federal student loan debt because they maxed out of Federal Student Loans. Typically, undergraduates max out around 65,000 or a little more depending on free money ie Perkins, scholarships, and school, and/or student resources. Then there’s the big problem of compounded interest, which your interview forgot to mention. Lastly, Federal Student Loans are for poor students and family’s with no credit or poor credit-who can’t afford private bank loans. Both parents and the student must qualify- if under 18, and the student lives at home, so both are poorer. Another problem with these loans is the compounding interest. The schools and fail to explain to students (children) and eager parents, the huge financial burden & responsibility of paying it back. You can’t claim bankruptcy on the debt to the Feds. Like your speaker alluded too, it’s unconscionable that these programs are designed to make a profit off the poor. Shame. Shame. Free market at it’s worse.

Just finished the 4/21/25 episode on student loans and was stunned to hear The Daily claim there’s “no cap” on student loan amounts. This is flat-out false — there are annual and aggregate caps on federal student loans, which a few minutes of fact-checking would have revealed. But fact-checking seems to be beneath the NYT these days. The episode even managed to twist things around to blame Obama — a bizarre stretch that fits into a larger pattern. Over the Biden years, the NYT has slid into lazy bothsidesism, and now in Trump 2.0, they’re back to sanewashing him through their favorite access journalist, Maggie Haberman. I tried to give The Daily another shot, but this kind of sloppy, misleading coverage is a dealbreaker. If you can’t get basic facts right, you can’t be trusted. Goodbye NYT — we had a good run.

This feel more and more dishonest, but today’s episode was ridiculous. I don’t know a single person who has received student loan forgiveness, and also I had to start repaying my loans years ago. Biden didn’t help me or anyone I know on this topic. Wake up NYT!

I’m ok with media that is honest about being left or right because I can fact check for the truth. But The NY Times, Maddow and this podcast is lies on top of lies. You call an actual illegal gang member “a Maryland dad” and act as if he was a US law abiding citizen. It’s like an alternate reality with you liberals these days. You support the actual bad guy rapists and murderers while saying you are so “Good” when the truth is, everything racial, hateful, corrupt, manipulative, misleading and just plain lies is what you really are. It takes mere seconds to check anything you say to see that it’s unsubstantiated. You stopped being the news a long long time ago. Hard pass on this nightmare.

88 days of Trump in a row. Used to like this podcast for its coverage of ALL significant current news. Guess I’ll wait 1372 days to tune in again

Is should be renamed the Daily Trump podcast. All the shows are focused on Trump. Mostly uninteresting. Like an entire episode asking people in Michigan what they think of Trump Tariffs for example. Nonsense

Very good that we hear alternative views of people in Detroit. I don’t agree with Trump but we need to hear different takes rather than screeching voices in blind opposition